What is Generally Recognized As Safe, and For Whom?

It’s really beyond past the time to bust the myth that what gets sold to us has been scientifically determined to be safe for us.

Take food additives this time. Unless you are growing your own organic food, or have a lab in your back pocket, there’s no real way of knowing what the heck we are being sold and consuming.

The food safety protection system is marred by minimal supervision by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, rife with apparent conflicts of interest in safety evaluations, and rendered all but toothless by a gaping loophole that allows companies to simply declare as safe hundreds of chemicals added to our foods—without any notification to the FDA or the public, according to an NRDC report”

For more information, please see:

Generally Recognized as Secret

  • An exemption in a 1958 law intended for common food ingredients “generally recognized as safe” or “GRAS” has been stretched so most new chemicals pass through it: the loophole has swallowed the law.
  • In an increasingly global marketplace where many additives and foods are imported into the United States, this loophole calls into question whether the FDA is performing its duty to protect public health.
  • Consumers should demand that their grocery stores and their favorite brands sell only food products with ingredients that the FDA has found safe, and ask the FDA and Congress to make the necessary changes.

More than a few of us might take issue with that part about “only food products with ingredients that the FDA has found safe” because more than a few things they claim are safe, are not! More on that below.

“More troubling, companies are allowed to hire their own experts, which may be their own employees, to determine the safety of chemicals used in food. This can present a serious conflict of interest, especially when FDA does not review the GRAS decision, because the evaluators may have a financial incentive to provide positive results, according to NRDC’s report.

In four case studies, NRDC found that chemicals that were subject to a withdrawn GRAS notice have been listed as an ingredient in foods marketed to the public, despite FDA’s serious concerns about their safety. They are:

  • Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG): A company determined as safe for use in beverages including teas, sport drinks, and juices, despite FDA’s citation of evidence it may cause leukemia in fetuses in human cells tests and animal studies showing it affected the thyroid, testis, spleen, pituitary, liver, and gastrointestinal tract.
  • Gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA): A company determined as safe for use in beverages, chewing gum, coffee, tea, and candy, despite FDA concerns that estimated exposure was well in excess of what the company itself considered safe.
  • Sweet lupin protein, fiber, and flour: A company determined as safe for use in baked goods, dairy products, gelatin, meats, and candy, despite FDA-raised questions about whether or not the chemicals would cause serious allergic reactions in those with peanut allergies.
  • Theobromine: A company determined as safe for use in bread, cereal, beverages, chewing gum, tea, soy milk, gelatin, candy, and yogurt and fruit smoothies, despite FDA’s question about the estimated consumption being five times higher than the safe consumption level reported by the company.

“The law places responsibility on FDA to ensure food Americans consume is safe. If the FDA is in the dark about the identity and safety of hundreds of chemicals, it cannot do its job. The “generally recognized as secret” loophole undermines public health,” said NRDC health scientist Maricel Maffini, the report’s coauthor.” …

A link to NRDC’s report, FOIA documents and a video about the GRAS issue is here:

Generally Recognized As  Secret

Generally Recognized As Secret

Food Industry to Americans: It’s Safe to Eat (or Drink). Trust Us.

…For new ingredients (or by legal terms, “substances”) to be added to food, companies must comply with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938. Food Safety News points out that under the law, “Substances are added to food either as food additives or as GRAS. The difference between the two paths is significant: FDA must sign off on food additives, but companies can use GRAS substances without FDA approval. Notably, companies make their own GRAS determinations, which they may or may not voluntarily submit to FDA for review.”

In other words, industry is allowed to police itself when it comes to the safety of a significant number of ingredients added to the foods and beverages our families eat and drink every day.

Food safety fail: Why isn’t the agency in charge of keeping us safe succeeding?

The FDA Is Out to Lunch

…the FDA is being slowly starved of the resources and manpower required to fulfill its mandate. In the 1970s the agency conducted 35,000 inspections of food-processing plants each year. Today, it inspects fewer than 8,000, although the number of facilities under its jurisdiction has skyrocketed.

The FDA, like many government departments, is linked to the groups it regulates by a revolving door for senior employees. Michael Taylor, the current deputy commissioner for foods, was formerly a vice president of Monsanto. Mitchell Cheeseman, now a Washington, D.C., attorney representing food companies, was the acting director of the Office of Food Additive Safety.

Acheson says that the agency has a “huge problem with a lack of personnel, which is a direct consequence of a lack of money.”

Why Obama Must Drop Michael Taylor


Petition: Tell Obama to Cease FDA Ties to Monsanto

Lest we forget, the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) is also in charge of drug safety

Risky Drugs: Why The FDA Cannot Be Trusted

The bar for “safe” is equally low, and over the past 30 years, approved drugs have caused an epidemic of harmful side effects, even when properly prescribed. Every week, about 53,000 excess hospitalizations and about 2400 excess deaths occur in the United States among people taking properly prescribed drugs to be healthier. One in every five drugs approved ends up causing serious harm,1 while one in ten provide substantial benefit compared to existing, established drugs. This is the opposite of what people want or expect from the FDA.

Prescription drugs are the 4th leading cause of death. Deaths and hospitalizations from over-dosing, errors, or recreational drug use would increase this total. American patients also suffer from about 80 million mild side effects a year, such as aches and pains, digestive discomforts, sleepiness or mild dizziness.

To answer the question I asked in the title, the answer seems to be:

safe for industries to profit even when causing harm!

Want to stay (or become) healthy?

Avoid petrochemicals, eat real food.

Eat Food Not Products and GMOs

The system is broken, it has been taken over by corporations. People, it’s time to reclaim our power!

We must let industry and government know that they do not have our permission to profit while harming our health and well-being, and that we expect them to take whatever actions are necessary to ensure things really are safe before they are used, and to immediately stop using anything or doing anything that shows any indication of causing harm to life.

Life is fragile. Life is precious.

17 responses to “What is Generally Recognized As Safe, and For Whom?

  1. OK, this is really interesting (and affects me personally), as that GABA stuff is sold as a supplement here. http://www.solgar.com/SolgarProducts/GABA-500-mg-Vegetable-Capsules.htm
    In fact, it is in something I take! Uh-oh.

  2. It is in this stuff. WP wouldn’t let me paste the link. I thought it was an innocent neurotransmitter. :-(

    • Hmm… I haven’t done any research into GABA. Maybe there are different sources or maybe it’s the amount that can be an issue (a certain dose might be good, but too much isn’t?). Definitely something for you to research.

  3. I just read the Wikipedia entry (I know, I know, Wikipedia, but it was convenient) and 90 percent was Greek to me. I did get this part: If your body is making GABA, it is OK, but if it is in a supplement, it is perhaps not OK and possibly useless. Sigh.
    “A number of commercial sources sell formulations of GABA for use as a dietary supplement, sometimes for sublingual administration. These sources typically claim that the supplement has a calming effect. These claims are not utterly unreasonable given the nature of GABA in human sympatholysis, but GABA as a tranquilizing agent, purely isolated in itself, is scientifically unsubstantiated or only irregularly demonstrated. For example, there is evidence stating that the calming effects of GABA can be observed in the human brain after administration of GABA as an oral supplement.[48] However, there is also more scientifically and medicinally relevant evidence that pure GABA does not cross the blood–brain barrier at therapeutically significant levels.”

    • Looks like you can save some $ and stop buying that supplement!
      I think I remember seeing mag malate in there.
      That’s a good one for Fibro. I need to find a new source, as my old one changed suppliers and I didn’t tolerate the new one…

      For supplement ideas, I have looked to Martin Pall’s tenth paradigm .org (?) Therapy page. He put a bunch of different protocols there, some of which a few people had been researching before his work was available on the web. Several of those supplements I found very useful and helpful.

      Of course, it would be great to be able to afford the detailed testing for what our own bodies are in need of…

  4. I take magnesium malate! I think it is doing something. I really can’t tell with so many supplements. The only one I know is doing something is HistDao, which is an enzyme that regulates histamine absorption from food. I know this will come as a giant shock to you, but I have very high histamine levels. :-)
    Yeah, I can definitely save some money by deleting the GABA thing! It wasn’t cheap.
    I know, I think there is some kind of genetic testing you can do, but I’m not sure about the accuracy. I know a lot of people on the Lyme forum do 23andme and then run the raw data through geneticgenie.com for analysis. There was some kerfluffle between 23andme and the FDA, but I’m not really sure what it was …

    • I’m waiting for the “lab in a pocket” to be developed and distributed to each and every one of us… Then I can test myself, test the air I breathe, the water I drink, the food I eat, the supplements and medicines I take, the clothing, furniture, electronics and everything else I buy… to see if everything is copasetic ;-)

  5. I am most curious to see what happens when the people of the world get and I do mean really get how our governments have allowed companies to use us as their lab rats while they get rich. Can you imagine the quantity of products that will get pulled off the shelves when companies finally have to prove the safety of their products and they cannot do so?!

    • Have you seen the photos of empty malls across America? Kind of surreal… And so wasteful…
      Maybe they can use them to pack away all those toxic products and ingredients and cover them in cement?

      More realistically, I see companies starting to (as they are being forced to by public pressure) make changes.
      A number of non-profit groups are conducting successful campaigns targeting major retailers and manufacturers to eliminate toxic chemicals from products and stores, and therefore, the supply chains…

      So, I suspect that this might be a slightly more gradual change than a wham bang situation…. I personally can’t wait to see the end of toxic laundry products so that it will be safer for me to open my windows and be outside!

  6. Linda, when you get your pocket lab, be sure to post it so we can download it, OK? :-)

  7. I guess I was thinking along the lines that if the government closed the loopholes in the law so that companies had to prove the safety of their ingredients. :D But you are right — it is going to be the masses of people demanding change that is going to make the difference. :D

    • Since the government is so full of corporate insiders now, they aren’t going to tighten up any regulations any time soon. Most that were in place are being dismantled as fast as they can (and the regulatory bodies are being de-funded), so it’s going to have to come from us.

      I have a post in the works on that… Just need some better air and brain to finish it…

  8. The NRDC link has changed and I can’t find the new one, but here’s the video:

  9. Check also the resources in the sidebar:

    Generally Recognized as Secret: Chemicals Added to Food in the United States

  10. Even the FDA has no idea what’s in the food you eat. And here’s why

    The Center for Public Integrity

    April 14, 2015


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.