Cats are adversely affected by toxic chemicals too
… “Higher TDCIPP exposures were associated with air freshener use, houses built since 2005 and cats that prefer to nap on upholstered furniture.” …
The same things cause disabling adverse effects in people with MCS/ES.
Posted in Air Quality, Chemicals, Health
Tagged air "fresheners", cats, chemical sensitivity, environmental sensitivities, flame retardants, fragrance chemicals, furniture, Housing, hyperthyroidism, IAQ, MCS, pets, toxic chemicals
Aside from making women feel like they need products that are
totally unnecessary and can be all around harmful in general, it’s
TOTALLY NOT COOL
to appropriate disability language
to sell products
that harm people with said disability!
If you are ‘scentsitive’, it means you need to be scent-free!
Posted in Accessibility, Air Quality, Chemicals, Environmental Health, Fragrance, Human Rights, Products
Tagged allergies, asthma, chemical sensitivity, environmental sensitivities, fragrance chemicals, IAQ, invisible disabilities, MCS, multiple chemical sensitivities, personal care, scentsitive, video
Many people believe that for a product to be sold, it has to first be proven safe.
Unfortunately this is far from the truth.
I ran across a great in depth article in Fast Company about product safety,
“There are no laws in place to ensure a company’s
product development process results in safe products,
because product safety is entirely voluntary.”
and to echo what I’ve been saying:
“Today, public outcry is doing much of the work
that government agencies cannot.”
More snippets from the very informative and long article follow:
Posted in Environment, Environmental Health, Health, Healthy Environment, Policy, Products, Public Health
Tagged child health, dressers, environmental sensitivities, fragrance chemicals, hazardous products
Has anyone ever asked you to be fragrance-free or told you that your fragrance is affecting their ability to function in some way, and you didn’t know what they were talking about?
You may or may not have heard that fragrance-free policies are becoming much more common now since so many people are being adversely affected by fragranced products.
Unfortunately, many people still don’t know why fragrance-free products are healthier for themselves and others, or unaware how common fragrances are!
It’s not just perfumes and colognes!
I’ve had people tell me they didn’t use any fragrance when they couldn’t name a single product they used for laundry or personal care and cleaning.
I’ve had people tell me they didn’t have any fragrance on when all of their products had fragrance listed in the ingredients.
People have also said “but I don’t smell anything”, or “I only used a little this morning” (or yesterday, or the day before yesterday).
They Said I Wasn’t Fragrance-Free. How Can That Be?
Think about that! Read the labels on all of your products, if you haven’t already.
There are all kinds of undisclosed and toxic ingredients in everyday fragranced products that are linked to cancer, birth defects, and other chronic illnesses.
And it’s not only the fragrances from the products you washed with or applied to your body, or the residues of laundry products in your clothing that are problematic!
Did you ever walk into a room where people were smoking, or have have smoked in the past?
Posted in Accessibility, Air Quality, Environmental Health, Fragrance, Human Rights, Policy, Public Health
Tagged allergies, asthma, cancer, chemical sensitivity, environmental sensitivities, fragrance chemicals, fragrance-free signs, hazardous air pollutants, IAQ, invisible disabilities, MCS, signs, smoking, VOCs
Get something stinky
as a gift?
Don’t toss it
on the street
or in the trash.
Don’t regift it
to a friend
Don’t donate it
to a charity.
Do send a message
loud and clear!
Now’s the time Continue reading
Posted in Air Quality, Chemicals, climate change, Environmental Health, Gifts, Pollution, Products
Tagged #ReturnToVendor, allergies, asthma, cancer, chemical sensitivity, fragrance chemicals, hazardous air pollutants, health, IAQ, MCS, petrochemicals, phthalates, plastic, toxic chemicals, VOCs
This report from the Auditor General of Canada came out in 2016. Nothing has changed as far as I have seen, and I keep my eyes open for these kinds of things.
“The Office of the Auditor General of Canada (OAG) conducts independent audits and studies that provide objective information, advice, and assurance to Parliament, territorial legislatures, boards of crown corporations, government, and Canadians.”
Here’s a short video, followed by the transcript, more from the report, and some relevant bits from a follow up by Health Canada:
Chemicals in Consumer Products and Cosmetics
Posted in Chemicals, Environmental Health, Fragrance, Fragrance and Cosmetics, Policy, Public Health
Tagged accessibility barriers, allergies, asthma, cancer, environmental sensitivities, essential oils, fragrance chemicals, Health Canada, Human Rights, MCS, MCS/ES, OAG, petrochemicals, phthalates, toxic trespass
Unilever, the company responsible for making disabling products like AXE (aka LYNX) has announced they will be expanding their product ingredient lists to include fragrance ingredients above 0.01 percent (100 parts per million) in a product’s formulation (via the SmartLabel app, but not on the actual labels *)
Here’s what we need to know:
* 20 parts per million (ppm) is the FDA’s standard for ‘gluten-free’ *
Which means that people who are allergic or “sensitive” can suffer serious and life threatening effects from substances at well below 100 ppm, and we still won’t know what is causing the symptoms, or what we need to avoid to stay alive.
This plan may help people who aren’t knowingly or immediately affected by fragrance exposures to choose their products more wisely, but it doesn’t go nearly far enough to help those of us who are disabled by or have life threatening reactions to their products.
Edited to add:
Unilever’s fragrance transparency is a major green-wash at 100 ppm, when gluten-free has to be below 20 ppm, and people with isothiazolinone (aka MI) allergy react to as little as 3 ppm, perhaps less.
Also, long-term health limit for fumes from dry-cleaning solvents has dropped from 20 parts per billion to an infinitesimal 2 parts per billion because long-term exposure to even very low concentrations can result in cancer, as well as fetal development problems for pregnant women.
Other interesting tidbits about Unilever:
Posted in Air Quality, Chemicals, Environmental Health, Fragrance, Products
Tagged allergies, asthma, AXE, chemical sensitivity, environmental sensitivities, Fragrance, fragrance chemicals, hazardous air pollutants, IAQ, MCS, petrochemicals, STINK, toxic chemicals, unilever